Speaker summary
92%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Turner results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) and Recency Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 96 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 90% (3,868 of 37,798 speakers). This Nina Turner is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Nina Turner
Speaker details