Speaker summary
79%3 analyzed articles/videos96 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nina Totenberg results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority and Confirmation Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 36.5% saturation with 35 hits. Analysis detected 69 faulty-reasoning hits from 96 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 24% and a BS Rank of 39% (17,614 of 28,757 speakers). This Nina Totenberg is better (less manipulative) than 61.20% of the peer group.
Nina Totenberg
Speaker details