Speaker summary
91%1 analyzed article/video61.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nicholas Hite results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 75% saturation with 46.125 hits. Analysis detected 384.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 61.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 58.3% and a BS Rank of 75% (7,270 of 28,364 speakers). This Nicholas Hite is worse (more manipulative) than 74.40% of the peer group.
Nicholas Hite
Speaker details