Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These New York Times/Siena results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 28 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (3,907 of 38,554 speakers). This New York Times/Siena is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
New York Times/Siena
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠90%New York Times/Siena (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos