Speaker summary
82%1 analyzed article/video82.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Neil Thomas results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Begging the Question, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 76.6% saturation with 71.25 hits. Analysis detected 335.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 82.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 34.6% and a BS Rank of 54% (13,258 of 28,364 speakers). This Neil Thomas is worse (more manipulative) than 53.30% of the peer group.
Neil Thomas
Speaker details