Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video50 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 50% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 75 faulty-reasoning hits from 50 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 50% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (12,321 of 38,569 speakers). This Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) is worse (more manipulative) than 68.10% of the peer group.
Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC)
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠69%Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC) (selected)50%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 50
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos