Speaker summary
68%2 analyzed articles/videos29.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Security Agency results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Hindsight Bias, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Representativeness Heuristic, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 27 hits. Analysis detected 108 faulty-reasoning hits from 29.5 analyzed words across 2 articles and videos, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,695 of 37,460 speakers). This National Security Agency is worse (more manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
National Security Agency
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
91%National Security Agency (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 29.5
Content count: 2
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos