Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video25 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Intelligence Counsel results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 25 faulty-reasoning hits from 25 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (2,162 of 19,396 speakers). This National Intelligence Counsel is worse (more manipulative) than 88.90% of the peer group.
National Intelligence Counsel
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠89%National Intelligence Counsel (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 25
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos