Speaker summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video37 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Institute of Justice results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 37 hits. Analysis detected 37 faulty-reasoning hits from 37 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠91% (3,782 of 38,572 speakers). This National Institute of Justice is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
National Institute of Justice
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠91%National Institute of Justice (selected)100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 37
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos