Speaker summary
91%1 analyzed article/video39 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Audubon Society results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 39 hits. Analysis detected 117 faulty-reasoning hits from 39 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 90% (2,960 of 28,904 speakers). This National Audubon Society is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
National Audubon Society
Speaker details