Speaker summary
⁠63%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These National Academy of Sciences results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 26 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠89% (2,237 of 20,313 speakers). This National Academy of Sciences is worse (more manipulative) than 89.00% of the peer group.
National Academy of Sciences
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠89%National Academy of Sciences (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 26
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos