Speaker summary
46%1 analyzed article/video32.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Sayre results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Hasty Generalization, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 34.7% saturation with 17 hits. Analysis detected 132 faulty-reasoning hits from 32.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 33.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (13,550 of 28,364 speakers). This Nathan Sayre is worse (more manipulative) than 52.20% of the peer group.
Nathan Sayre
Speaker details