Speaker summary
73%1 analyzed article/video327 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nathan Pope results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Quote-first Misdirection, and Availability Heuristic, with Fundamental Attribution Error as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 78 hits. Analysis detected 610.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 327 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.6% and a BS Rank of 13% (24,785 of 28,364 speakers). This Nathan Pope is better (less manipulative) than 87.40% of the peer group.
Nathan Pope
Speaker ranking list
Speaker details
Total words: 327
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos