Speaker summary
58% 11 analyzed articles/videos 1,091.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natasha Bagdasarian results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation) , Confirmation Bias , and Loss Aversion , with Indoctrination as the most egregious example at 12.8% saturation with 139.259 hits . Analysis detected 1,351.288 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,091.667 analyzed words across 11 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 2% (44,201 of 44,782 speakers). This Natasha Bagdasarian is better (less manipulative) than 98.70% of the peer group. Natasha Bagdasarian
Speaker details
Total words: 1,091.667
Article count: 11
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
1% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.3% percentile 3.5% BS Score11 analyzed videos1.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–25%
0.0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Speaker 0.6% 0.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Speaker 12.8% 12.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 4.9% 4.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Speaker 7.7% 7.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Speaker 4.4% 4.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 2.9% 2.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Speaker 0.8% 0.8% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Loss Aversion Sitewide 2.5% Speaker 6.3% 6.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 5.8% 5.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 5% 5% 10% 10% 15% 15% 20% 20% 25% 25% Negativity Bias: Speaker 0.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 15.9% Indoctrination: Speaker 12.8%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Authority: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.4%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 7.7%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 2.5% Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.3%, sitewide 1.9% Optimism Bias: Speaker 2.7%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 0.8%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Speaker 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Speaker 4.0%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 0.7%, sitewide 3.3% Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 3.0%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Speaker 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Speaker 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 2.2% Circular Reasoning: Speaker 2.0%, sitewide 0.1% Begging the Question: Speaker 1.4%, sitewide 1.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst