Speaker summary
⁠45%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Easter results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 46.7% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 44 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠58% (19,176 of 45,145 speakers). This Natalie Easter is worse (more manipulative) than 57.50% of the peer group.
Natalie Easter
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠58%Natalie Easter (selected)37%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 40
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

58% percentile
025507510057.5% percentile
36.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos40 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 46.7%46.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 26.7%26.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 46.7%, sitewide 15.9%Negativity Bias: Speaker 26.7%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos