Speaker summary
32%1 analyzed article/video246.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Natalie Arrow results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Confirmation Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 31.9% saturation with 96 hits. Analysis detected 278.74 faulty-reasoning hits from 246.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.3% and a BS Rank of 31% (19,624 of 28,364 speakers). This Natalie Arrow is better (less manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Natalie Arrow
Speaker details