Speaker summary
93%1 analyzed article/video32 analyzed words
BS Summary: These NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Representativeness Heuristic, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 32 hits. Analysis detected 64 faulty-reasoning hits from 32 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,671 of 37,733 speakers). This NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center is worse (more manipulative) than 90.30% of the peer group.
NASA’s Armstrong Flight Research Center
Speaker details