Speaker summary
⁠91%1 analyzed article/video15 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Nana Abernathy results contain 1 faulty reasoning type, including Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 15 hits. Analysis detected 15 faulty-reasoning hits from 15 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (2,907 of 28,364 speakers). This Nana Abernathy is worse (more manipulative) than 89.80% of the peer group.
Nana Abernathy
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
⁠90%Nana Abernathy (selected)100%
⁠100%4MATIV100%
⁠100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 15
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos