Speaker summary
56%9 analyzed articles/videos457.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Naim Qassem results contain 18 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Slippery Slope, and Biased Writer Voice, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 55.2% saturation with 455 hits. Analysis detected 1,426.616 faulty-reasoning hits from 457.333 analyzed words across 9 articles, generating a BS Score of 11% and a BS Rank of 14% (24,503 of 28,364 speakers). This Naim Qassem is better (less manipulative) than 86.40% of the peer group.
Naim Qassem