Speaker summary
77%1 analyzed article/video40 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mohammad al-Farah results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including False Dilemma, Framing Effect, and Unattributed Quote, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 40 hits. Analysis detected 160 faulty-reasoning hits from 40 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 90% (2,187 of 20,171 speakers). This Mohammad al-Farah is worse (more manipulative) than 89.20% of the peer group.
Mohammad al-Farah
Speaker details