Speaker summary
92%1 analyzed article/video36 analyzed words
BS Summary: These MIT Election Data + Science Lab results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 36 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,125 of 31,870 speakers). This MIT Election Data + Science Lab is worse (more manipulative) than 90.20% of the peer group.
MIT Election Data + Science Lab
Speaker details