Speaker summary
⁠51%3 analyzed articles/videos125.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Miriam Sim results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, Loss Aversion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 56 hits. Analysis detected 166.903 faulty-reasoning hits from 125.333 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 21.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (28,461 of 45,123 speakers). This Miriam Sim is better (less manipulative) than 63.10% of the peer group.
Miriam Sim
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠37%Miriam Sim (selected)22%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

37% percentile
025507510036.9% percentile
21.6% BS Score3 analyzed videos125.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 32.1%32.1%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 28.0%28.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 14.6%14.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 29.2%29.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 32.1%, sitewide 1.9%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 29.2%, sitewide 15.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 28.0%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 14.6%, sitewide 0.0%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos