Speaker summary
93%1 analyzed article/video20 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Minnesota Board of Pardons results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 40 faulty-reasoning hits from 20 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 91% (3,625 of 38,569 speakers). This Minnesota Board of Pardons is worse (more manipulative) than 90.60% of the peer group.
Minnesota Board of Pardons
Speaker details