Speaker summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video82.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michelle Mangold results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Availability Heuristic, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 48.9% saturation with 64 hits. Analysis detected 155 faulty-reasoning hits from 82.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 23.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠41% (26,899 of 45,120 speakers). This Michelle Mangold is better (less manipulative) than 59.60% of the peer group.
Michelle Mangold
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠41%Michelle Mangold (selected)24%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 82.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

40% percentile
025507510040.4% percentile
23.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos82.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 48.9%48.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 28.2%28.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Speaker 11.4%11.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 12.2%12.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 17.6%17.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Anecdotal: Speaker 48.9%, sitewide 5.2%Negativity Bias: Speaker 28.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 12.2%, sitewide 9.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 11.4%, sitewide 3.3%AnecdotalSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos