Speaker summary
57%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Michael Fanone results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 61.9% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 61.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 39.6% and a BS Rank of 58% (11,216 of 26,155 speakers). This Michael Fanone is worse (more manipulative) than 57.10% of the peer group.
Michael Fanone
Speaker details