Speaker summary
⁠81%1 analyzed article/video68 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melinda Reed results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Appeal to Emotion, with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 85.3% saturation with 58.853 hits. Analysis detected 232.853 faulty-reasoning hits from 68 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 53.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠74% (10,117 of 38,671 speakers). This Melinda Reed is worse (more manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Melinda Reed
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠74%Melinda Reed (selected)54%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 68
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos