Speaker summary
ā 92%1 analyzed article/video112 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Melinda Person results contain 11 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Ad Hominem, and Composition/Division, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 75.4% saturation with 104 hits. Analysis detected 580.962 faulty-reasoning hits from 112 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 42.2% and a BS Rank of ā 60% (11,378 of 28,364 speakers). This Melinda Person is worse (more manipulative) than 59.90% of the peer group.
Melinda Person
Speaker details