Speaker summary
⁠80%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Megan Marks results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Pessimism Bias, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 36 hits. Analysis detected 72 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of ⁠80% (4,641 of 22,592 speakers). This Megan Marks is worse (more manipulative) than 79.50% of the peer group.
Megan Marks
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠80%Megan Marks (selected)75%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos