Speaker summary
67%1 analyzed article/video66.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matthew Litt results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Loss Aversion, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 80.5% saturation with 60.375 hits. Analysis detected 166.375 faulty-reasoning hits from 66.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.1% and a BS Rank of 49% (14,485 of 28,364 speakers). This Matthew Litt is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group.
Matthew Litt
Speaker details