Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video28 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Shumer results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Quote-first Misdirection, and Recency Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 28 hits. Analysis detected 112 faulty-reasoning hits from 28 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (2,140 of 21,084 speakers). This Matt Shumer is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
Matt Shumer
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠90%Matt Shumer (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 28
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Analyzed articles and videos