Speaker summary
⁠92%1 analyzed article/video25 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Matt Damon results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice and Special Pleading, with Actor-Observer Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 25 hits. Analysis detected 75 faulty-reasoning hits from 25 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of ⁠90% (2,182 of 21,635 speakers). This Matt Damon is worse (more manipulative) than 89.90% of the peer group.
Matt Damon
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
⁠0%Mike Muse1%
⁠0%Vivek Chibber1%
⁠0%Science2%
⁠90%Matt Damon (selected)100%
⁠100%988 National & Suicide Crisis Lifeline100%
⁠100%5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals100%
⁠100%314 Action Fund100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 25
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos