Speaker summary
⁠44%1 analyzed article/video161.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maryland Department of Natural Resources results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Loss Aversion, Recency Bias, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37.7% saturation with 110 hits. Analysis detected 438 faulty-reasoning hits from 161.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 12.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠19% (36,732 of 45,123 speakers). This Maryland Department of Natural Resources is better (less manipulative) than 81.40% of the peer group.
Maryland Department of Natural Resources
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠19%Maryland Department of Natural Resources (selected)13%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 161.333
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

19% percentile
025507510018.6% percentile
12.5% BS Score1 analyzed videos161.3 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 37.7%37.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Speaker 20.2%20.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Speaker 17.5%17.5%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 12.3%12.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Speaker 13.4%13.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Speaker 6.8%6.8%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 6.2%6.2%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Speaker 6.2%6.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 37.7%, sitewide 11.1%Framing Effect: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 26.9%Loss Aversion: Speaker 20.2%, sitewide 2.5%Recency Bias: Speaker 17.5%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Speaker 13.4%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 10.3%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 7.2%, sitewide 8.1%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 6.8%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Speaker 6.2%, sitewide 1.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos