Speaker summary
92%1 analyzed article/video34.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Penn results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Burden of Proof, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 46 hits. Analysis detected 172.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 34.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 75% and a BS Rank of 80% (4,818 of 23,708 speakers). This Mark Penn is worse (more manipulative) than 79.70% of the peer group.
Mark Penn
Speaker details