Speaker summary
94%1 analyzed article/video26 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Patrick results contain 2 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 100% saturation with 26 hits. Analysis detected 52 faulty-reasoning hits from 26 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 100% and a BS Rank of 92% (3,298 of 37,384 speakers). This Mark Patrick is worse (more manipulative) than 91.20% of the peer group.
Mark Patrick
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%MARGARET BRENNAN1%
0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
92%Mark Patrick (selected)100%
100%314 Action Fund100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 26
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos