Speaker summary
84%2 analyzed articles/videos383 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Fairhurst results contain 22 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Fundamental Attribution Error, and Ad Hominem, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 49.9% saturation with 190.974 hits. Analysis detected 1,036.625 faulty-reasoning hits from 383 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 12.4% and a BS Rank of 17% (23,614 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Fairhurst is better (less manipulative) than 83.30% of the peer group.
Mark Fairhurst
Speaker details