Speaker summary
92%1 analyzed article/video70.5 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark DeSaulnier results contain 14 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Quote-first Misdirection, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 89.6% saturation with 63.171 hits. Analysis detected 502.531 faulty-reasoning hits from 70.5 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 47.9% and a BS Rank of 64% (10,409 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark DeSaulnier is worse (more manipulative) than 63.30% of the peer group.
Mark DeSaulnier
Speaker details