Speaker summary
61%2 analyzed articles/videos60.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Mark Alford results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Indoctrination, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 65% saturation with 38.025 hits. Analysis detected 137.025 faulty-reasoning hits from 60.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 35% and a BS Rank of 54% (13,160 of 28,364 speakers). This Mark Alford is worse (more manipulative) than 53.60% of the peer group.
Mark Alford
Speaker details