Speaker summary
45%1 analyzed article/video65.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marcus Thuram results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Unattributed Quote, and Indoctrination, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 83.7% saturation with 82 hits. Analysis detected 212 faulty-reasoning hits from 65.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 36.1% and a BS Rank of 55% (12,886 of 28,364 speakers). This Marcus Thuram is worse (more manipulative) than 54.60% of the peer group.
Marcus Thuram
Speaker details