Speaker summary
73%1 analyzed article/video95.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marco Polo results contain 10 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Framing Effect, and Politically Right Leaning Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 66.9% saturation with 79 hits. Analysis detected 321.854 faulty-reasoning hits from 95.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 30.4% and a BS Rank of 49% (14,732 of 28,364 speakers). This Marco Polo is better (less manipulative) than 51.90% of the peer group.
Marco Polo
Speaker details