Speaker summary
â 84%1 analyzed article/video510 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Marc Weinberg results contain 15 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Framing Effect, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 47.6% saturation with 243 hits. Analysis detected 781 faulty-reasoning hits from 510 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.2% and a BS Rank of â 12% (25,010 of 28,364 speakers). This Marc Weinberg is better (less manipulative) than 88.20% of the peer group.
Marc Weinberg
Speaker details