Speaker summary
⁠78%1 analyzed article/video76 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maggie Van Cantfort results contain 3 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization and In-Group Bias, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 81% saturation with 102 hits. Analysis detected 204 faulty-reasoning hits from 76 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 73.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠82% (8,284 of 44,720 speakers). This Maggie Van Cantfort is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group.
Maggie Van Cantfort
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠82%Maggie Van Cantfort (selected)74%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 76
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

82% percentile
025507510081.5% percentile
73.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos76 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–125%
0.0%20%40%60%80%100%120%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 100.0%100.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 81.0%81.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Speaker 40.5%40.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%80%80%100%100%120%120%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 100.0%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 81.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Speaker 40.5%, sitewide 6.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos