Speaker summary
72%1 analyzed article/video162.333 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Maggie Nurrenbern results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Fundamental Attribution Error, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Negativity Bias, with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 41.029 hits. Analysis detected 475.092 faulty-reasoning hits from 162.333 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 17.4% and a BS Rank of 27% (19,676 of 26,922 speakers). This Maggie Nurrenbern is better (less manipulative) than 73.10% of the peer group.
Maggie Nurrenbern
Speaker details