Speaker summary
85%1 analyzed article/video136 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Luke Goodrich results contain 16 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 37.7% saturation with 77 hits. Analysis detected 397.667 faulty-reasoning hits from 136 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 14.8% and a BS Rank of 24% (34,342 of 45,128 speakers). This Luke Goodrich is better (less manipulative) than 76.10% of the peer group.
Luke Goodrich
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
0%Paul Heideman1%
0%The Brookings Institution1%
0%Conor Heffernan1%
0%Gen Jack Keane1%
0%Katy Longshore1%
24%Luke Goodrich (selected)15%
100%291 Brewhouse100%
100%21 Grams100%
100%2035 Initiative100%
100%1X representative100%
100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 136
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

24% percentile
025507510023.9% percentile
14.8% BS Score1 analyzed videos136 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Speaker 37.8%37.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Speaker 35.8%35.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Speaker 23.0%23.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 24.5%24.5%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Speaker 15.7%15.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Speaker 4.9%4.9%Appeal to NatureSitewide 0.2%Speaker 12.3%12.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 22.1%22.1%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Speaker 11.8%11.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Speaker 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Confirmation Bias: Speaker 37.8%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 35.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 24.5%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 23.0%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 22.1%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 19.2%Straw Man: Speaker 15.7%, sitewide 0.9%Appeal to Nature: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 0.2%Optimism Bias: Speaker 12.3%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Speaker 11.8%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Speaker 7.8%, sitewide 1.7%In-Group Bias: Speaker 6.9%, sitewide 6.9%Burden of Proof: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.4%Indoctrination: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 0.0%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Speaker 4.9%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos