Speaker summary
75%1 analyzed article/video111 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liz Glazer results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Negativity Bias, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 66.7% saturation with 74 hits. Analysis detected 379 faulty-reasoning hits from 111 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 37.9% and a BS Rank of 57% (12,360 of 28,364 speakers). This Liz Glazer is worse (more manipulative) than 56.40% of the peer group.
Liz Glazer
Speaker details