Speaker summary
⁠94%1 analyzed article/video74 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Livingston III results contain 6 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Biased Writer Voice, and Burden of Proof, with Ambiguity (Equivocation) as the most egregious example at 51.4% saturation with 38 hits. Analysis detected 218 faulty-reasoning hits from 74 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 49.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠67% (15,140 of 44,973 speakers). This Livingston III is worse (more manipulative) than 66.30% of the peer group.
Livingston III
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠67%Livingston III (selected)50%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 74
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

66% percentile
025507510066.3% percentile
49.1% BS Score1 analyzed videos74 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Speaker 51.4%51.4%Burden of ProofSitewide 0.4%Speaker 48.6%48.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Speaker 48.6%48.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Speaker 48.6%48.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Speaker 48.6%48.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Speaker 48.6%48.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Speaker 51.4%, sitewide 0.8%Availability Heuristic: Speaker 48.6%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Speaker 48.6%, sitewide 5.3%Burden of Proof: Speaker 48.6%, sitewide 0.4%Framing Effect: Speaker 48.6%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Speaker 48.6%, sitewide 8.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos