Speaker summary
78%1 analyzed article/video418.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindy Li results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Ambiguity (Equivocation), Anecdotal, and Burden of Proof, with Confirmation Bias as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 163 hits. Analysis detected 1,568.259 faulty-reasoning hits from 418.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 10.1% and a BS Rank of 12% (25,085 of 28,364 speakers). This Lindy Li is better (less manipulative) than 88.40% of the peer group.
Lindy Li
Speaker details