Speaker summary
ā 75%1 analyzed article/video58.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsey Rodarmer results contain 5 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Framing Effect, and Ambiguity (Equivocation), with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 77.3% saturation with 68 hits. Analysis detected 149 faulty-reasoning hits from 58.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 40% and a BS Rank of ā 59% (11,885 of 28,364 speakers). This Lindsey Rodarmer is worse (more manipulative) than 58.10% of the peer group.
Lindsey Rodarmer
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
ā 0%The Brookings Institution1%
ā 0%Gen Jack Keane1%
ā 0%Shahryar Yadegar1%
ā 0%Mike Muse1%
ā 0%Manhattan Institute for Policy Research, Inc.1%
ā 59%Lindsey Rodarmer (selected)40%
ā 100%4MATIV100%
ā 100%42nd Avenue and High Street I-880 access improvement project page100%
ā 100%314 Action Fund100%
ā 100%21 Grams100%
ā 100%1X representative100%
Speaker details
Total words: 58.667
Article count: 1
Authors

Analyzed articles and videos