Speaker summary
⁠64%2 analyzed articles/videos68.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsay Rosshirt results contain 4 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Appeal to Authority, and Hindsight Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 63.9% saturation with 41.193 hits. Analysis detected 101.193 faulty-reasoning hits from 68.667 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 28.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠48% (23,061 of 44,327 speakers). This Lindsay Rosshirt is better (less manipulative) than 52.00% of the peer group.
Lindsay Rosshirt
Speaker ranking list
PercentileSpeakerBS Score
⁠0%Paul Heideman1%
⁠0%The Brookings Institution1%
⁠0%Conor Heffernan1%
⁠0%Gen Jack Keane1%
⁠0%Katy Longshore1%
⁠48%Lindsay Rosshirt (selected)29%
⁠100%291 Brewhouse100%
⁠100%21 Grams100%
⁠100%2035 Initiative100%
⁠100%1X representative100%
⁠100%1455 Storytelling Arts100%
Speaker details
Total words: 68.667
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed speakers

48% percentile
025507510048.0% percentile
28.6% BS Score2 analyzed videos68.7 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

SpeakerSitewideShared scale 0–75%
0.0%20%40%60%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Speaker 63.9%63.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Speaker 25.2%25.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Speaker 17.6%17.6%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Speaker 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%20%20%40%40%60%60%Halo Effect: Speaker 63.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anecdotal: Speaker 25.2%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Speaker 17.6%, sitewide 11.1%Hindsight Bias: Speaker 7.6%, sitewide 1.4%Halo EffectSitewide rateSpeaker rate

Analyzed articles and videos