Speaker summary
ā 42%1 analyzed article/video2,680.667 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsay Chervinsky results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Ambiguity (Equivocation), and Anecdotal, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 686.906 hits. Analysis detected 2,457.117 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,680.667 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ā 1% (28,237 of 28,364 speakers). This Lindsay Chervinsky is better (less manipulative) than 99.60% of the peer group.
Lindsay Chervinsky
Speaker details