Speaker summary
82% 1 analyzed article/video 192 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Linda Blair results contain 9 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal , Availability Heuristic , and Self-Serving Bias , with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 51.7% saturation with 149 hits . Analysis detected 728.5 faulty-reasoning hits from 192 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 31.7% and a BS Rank of 53% (21,630 of 45,124 speakers). This Linda Blair is worse (more manipulative) than 52.10% of the peer group. Linda Blair
Speaker details
Total words: 192
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed speakers
52% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 52.1% percentile 31.7% BS Score1 analyzed videos192 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Speaker 51.7% 51.7% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Speaker 41.7% 41.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Speaker 43.1% 43.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Speaker 37.5% 37.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Speaker 34.0% 34.0% Red Herring Sitewide 0.7% Speaker 24.8% 24.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Speaker 29.3% 29.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Speaker 10.8% 10.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Speaker 12.5% 12.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Post Hoc (False Cause): Speaker 51.7%, sitewide 3.3% Anecdotal: Speaker 43.1%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Speaker 41.7%, sitewide 3.7% Availability Heuristic: Speaker 37.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Speaker 34.0%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Speaker 29.3%, sitewide 6.0% Framing Effect: Speaker 10.8%, sitewide 26.9% Red Herring: Speaker 24.8%, sitewide 0.7% Appeal to Emotion: Speaker 12.5%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide rate Speaker rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst